In the first form, the return value of EXPR is parsed and executed as if it were a little Perl program. The value of the expression (which is itself determined within scalar context) is first parsed, and if there were no errors, executed as a block within the lexical context of the current Perl program. This means, that in particular, any outer lexical variables are visible to it, and any package variable settings or subroutine and format definitions remain afterwards.
Note that the value is parsed every time the eval
executes.
If EXPR is omitted, evaluates $_
. This form is typically used to
delay parsing and subsequent execution of the text of EXPR until run time.
If the unicode_eval
feature is enabled (which is the default under a
use 5.16
or higher declaration), EXPR or $_
is treated as a string of
characters, so use utf8
declarations have no effect, and source filters
are forbidden. In the absence of the unicode_eval
feature, the string
will sometimes be treated as characters and sometimes as bytes, depending
on the internal encoding, and source filters activated within the eval
exhibit the erratic, but historical, behaviour of affecting some outer file
scope that is still compiling. See also the evalbytes keyword, which
always treats its input as a byte stream and works properly with source
filters, and the feature pragma.
In the second form, the code within the BLOCK is parsed only once--at the
same time the code surrounding the eval
itself was parsed--and executed
within the context of the current Perl program. This form is typically
used to trap exceptions more efficiently than the first (see below), while
also providing the benefit of checking the code within BLOCK at compile
time.
The final semicolon, if any, may be omitted from the value of EXPR or within the BLOCK.
In both forms, the value returned is the value of the last expression
evaluated inside the mini-program; a return statement may be also used, just
as with subroutines. The expression providing the return value is evaluated
in void, scalar, or list context, depending on the context of the eval
itself. See wantarray for more on how the evaluation context can be
determined.
If there is a syntax error or runtime error, or a die
statement is
executed, eval
returns undef
in scalar context
or an empty list in list context, and $@
is set to the error
message. (Prior to 5.16, a bug caused undef
to be returned
in list context for syntax errors, but not for runtime errors.)
If there was no error, $@
is set to the empty string. A
control flow operator like last
or goto
can bypass the setting of
$@
. Beware that using eval
neither silences Perl from printing
warnings to STDERR, nor does it stuff the text of warning messages into $@
.
To do either of those, you have to use the $SIG{__WARN__}
facility, or
turn off warnings inside the BLOCK or EXPR using no warnings 'all'
.
See warn, perlvar, warnings and perllexwarn.
Note that, because eval
traps otherwise-fatal errors, it is useful for
determining whether a particular feature (such as socket
or symlink
)
is implemented. It is also Perl's exception-trapping mechanism, where
the die operator is used to raise exceptions.
If you want to trap errors when loading an XS module, some problems with
the binary interface (such as Perl version skew) may be fatal even with
eval
unless $ENV{PERL_DL_NONLAZY}
is set. See perlrun.
If the code to be executed doesn't vary, you may use the eval-BLOCK
form to trap run-time errors without incurring the penalty of
recompiling each time. The error, if any, is still returned in $@
.
Examples:
Using the eval{}
form as an exception trap in libraries does have some
issues. Due to the current arguably broken state of __DIE__
hooks, you
may wish not to trigger any __DIE__
hooks that user code may have installed.
You can use the local $SIG{__DIE__}
construct for this purpose,
as this example shows:
This is especially significant, given that __DIE__
hooks can call
die
again, which has the effect of changing their error messages:
Because this promotes action at a distance, this counterintuitive behavior may be fixed in a future release.
With an eval
, you should be especially careful to remember what's
being looked at when:
Cases 1 and 2 above behave identically: they run the code contained in
the variable $x. (Although case 2 has misleading double quotes making
the reader wonder what else might be happening (nothing is).) Cases 3
and 4 likewise behave in the same way: they run the code '$x'
, which
does nothing but return the value of $x. (Case 4 is preferred for
purely visual reasons, but it also has the advantage of compiling at
compile-time instead of at run-time.) Case 5 is a place where
normally you would like to use double quotes, except that in this
particular situation, you can just use symbolic references instead, as
in case 6.
Before Perl 5.14, the assignment to $@
occurred before restoration
of localized variables, which means that for your code to run on older
versions, a temporary is required if you want to mask some but not all
errors:
eval BLOCK
does not count as a loop, so the loop control statements
next
, last
, or redo
cannot be used to leave or restart the block.
An eval ''
executed within a subroutine defined
in the DB
package doesn't see the usual
surrounding lexical scope, but rather the scope of the first non-DB piece
of code that called it. You don't normally need to worry about this unless
you are writing a Perl debugger.